Imagination creator
Originates worlds, premises and points of view that generative systems render at any scale.
Why it holds: Preference
WHAT IS LEFT
Every job below carries a forecast: how much of the work is still done by a person, indexed to 100 in 2022 and projected to 2036. It is drawn like a price chart because that is the honest shape of the claim, a direction with noise. The numbers are ours. The verdict is yours: for each job, say whether the forecast applies.
78 of the 100 point up. They do so for one of four reasons, none of which is that a machine cannot do the work.
Machine compute is finite and has an opportunity cost. Work exists; it may not pay.
People value that a human did it. A premium on provenance.
Legitimacy cannot be delegated to something that cannot be blamed.
The room, and the body in it, is the scarce good.
100 of 100
Originates worlds, premises and points of view that generative systems render at any scale.
Why it holds: Preference
Designs an organisation’s cognition as a whole: which decisions go to which agents, where the humans sit.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Cowen expects the argument about where legitimacy resides to become a standing occupation.
Why it holds: Accountability
The premise is the product. Carroll’s muse with a production department of a hundred thousand.
Why it holds: Preference
Tells the machine when it is wrong, in writing, at scale.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
The job HBR named in February and the boards priced at about $103k, no engineering required.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Grades the data the models still lack, in a field only a specialist can grade.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
The word nobody uses for the skill everybody now lists.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
The one hour of a specialist’s time that an agent cannot replace and must route to.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Notices when the agents go wrong, and is paid to notice.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Today’s title for the person who decides what the agents are for.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Finds the failure the model did not know it had.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Microsoft’s phrase: designing how work gets done across humans and AI.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Cowen thinks this could become the largest sector after healthcare.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Owns the shape of a decision rather than the answer to it.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Someone must be blameable for what the system was allowed to do.
Why it holds: Accountability
Decides what the agents are allowed to know and remember.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Which future to plan for is a choice, and choices are what is left.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
A company of one and a hundred agents is now a real shape.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Cowen’s in-person appearances grew 2.5× after GPT-4 shipped. The room is the scarce good.
Why it holds: Presence
Someone buys the compute and decides what it is spent on. Opportunity cost made into a job.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
A showrunner without a writers’ room.
Why it holds: Preference
Someone climbs the tower.
Why it holds: Presence
A game designer without a studio.
Why it holds: Preference
Physical presence as the future terms of competition.
Why it holds: Presence
Half of Microsoft’s respondents name quality control of AI output as their fastest-rising skill. That is taste.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Physical togetherness as a requirement for wellbeing.
Why it holds: Presence
The role the intelligence architect succeeds. Grows before it is renamed.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Selection is scarce when supply is infinite.
Why it holds: Preference
Ben Goertzel’s second answer.
Why it holds: Presence
Setting clear intent is the fastest-growing description of the job.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
The wish and the judgement of what is good. Production is somebody else’s problem now.
Why it holds: Preference
Trials on real humans need a human who is responsible for them.
Why it holds: Accountability
The hand that fixes the wire. No simulation trips the breaker.
Why it holds: Presence
The hand that fixes the pipe.
Why it holds: Presence
Sits in the kitchen and watches what people actually do.
Why it holds: Presence
Harari’s hope: the machines force us to ask what a human is for.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
The counterpart will not deal with an agent.
Why it holds: Accountability
The person at the bedside.
Why it holds: Presence
The plan is free. Someone watching you do it is not.
Why it holds: Presence
Rooms, again.
Why it holds: Presence
Starts and ends the day in dashboards nobody made by hand.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Deciding what a company means is not a generation task.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
The diagnosis is the machine’s; the sign-off is the doctor’s, and so is the liability.
Why it holds: Accountability
Nobody delegates a three-year-old to a screen on purpose.
Why it holds: Presence
Hands on a body.
Why it holds: Presence
Every house is a one-off on site.
Why it holds: Presence
The body in the trial that no simulation can consent for.
Why it holds: Presence
Tastes it.
Why it holds: Presence
Chooses among ten thousand renders. Draws none of them.
Why it holds: Preference
Goertzel named educators first: the job is the relationship, not the information transfer.
Why it holds: Presence
Present at the one event that cannot be rendered.
Why it holds: Presence
Welcome is a physical act.
Why it holds: Presence
Goes somewhere and reports back with judgement.
Why it holds: Presence
Specification survives; the ticket-writing half of the job does not.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
A point of view, rendered. The crew is the part that thins.
Why it holds: Preference
Regulators want a name.
Why it holds: Accountability
The handmade object you eat.
Why it holds: Preference
Arrives. The machine does the triage on the way.
Why it holds: Presence
One in five young Americans has an AI relationship. The human one becomes the premium version.
Why it holds: Preference
The patient cannot describe the symptom to a chatbot.
Why it holds: Presence
A person is still the cheapest general-purpose sensor.
Why it holds: Presence
The novel written by someone who has actually been heartbroken.
Why it holds: Preference
The vote of a board is a decision society keeps in human hands.
Why it holds: Accountability
A body in the building.
Why it holds: Presence
Touch, talk, and a chair.
Why it holds: Presence
Walks you there.
Why it holds: Presence
Was there. The one sentence a model cannot write.
Why it holds: Presence
Transitional. Peaks when everything is automated and the title stops meaning anything.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
Drafting goes; the building that has to stand, and the stamp on it, stays.
Why it holds: Accountability
Robotic hands, human name on the consent form.
Why it holds: Accountability
The release of a weapon: the clearest case of a decision no one will let a machine own.
Why it holds: Accountability
Ritual, in person.
Why it holds: Preference
Knocks on the door.
Why it holds: Presence
Provenance is the label.
Why it holds: Preference
Sentencing is kept in human hands on purpose.
Why it holds: Accountability
Never paid. Still wanted.
Why it holds: Preference
The one job that is, by definition, held by a person.
Why it holds: Accountability
Music is free. Music by someone is not.
Why it holds: Preference
Amodei’s Jevons case: cheaper legal services mean more lawyers. Over decades.
Why it holds: Comparative advantage
The plane flies itself. The passengers will not board without a person up front.
Why it holds: Accountability
A signature that can be prosecuted. Fewer hours, same signature.
Why it holds: Accountability
A witness with a stamp. Ancient, and oddly durable.
Why it holds: Accountability
Someone answers for the dose.
Why it holds: Accountability
The reading goes; the attending who signs it stays in the accountable family.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Trust migrates to whatever seems to work. Harari’s cows.
Why it holds: No standing argument
The research half of law is the half that went first.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Synthesis was the job. Synthesis is free.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Closed the tickets.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Three years ago the same sentences about safe jobs were being written about code.
Why it holds: No standing argument
The deck is written before the meeting is scheduled.
Why it holds: No standing argument
The first-round call is an agent on both ends.
Why it holds: No standing argument
The drafts. Agents wrote them.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Ran the follow-ups.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Entries post themselves.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Making is free. Choosing is in the other family.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Literary translation keeps a preference premium. The rest does not.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Synthetic media floods every screen.
Why it holds: No standing argument
The job that was always waiting to be a script.
Why it holds: No standing argument
Already gone.
Why it holds: No standing argument
The forecasts are editorial estimates drawn from the sources in Part IV: the Microsoft Work Trend Index 2026, the World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, the Anthropic Economic Index, and the essays by Amodei, Susskind, Smith, Cowen and Stevenson. They are a starting position, not a prediction. The tallies are the correction. Verdicts are stored against an anonymous first-party cookie, one per person per job, and nothing else is recorded.